June 17, 2004
Steadfast and Unwavering
Here are the editors of The New York Times:
It's hard to imagine how the commission investigating the 2001 terrorist attacks could have put it more clearly yesterday: there was never any evidence of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, between Saddam Hussein and Sept. 11.Now President Bush should apologize to the American people, who were led to believe something different.
And here is George Bush himself, as quoted by Reuters:
"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al-Qaeda is because there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda," Bush told reporters after a meeting with his Cabinet."This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaeda. We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda," the Republican president said.
It is said among election-watchers that one of the qualities of George Bush admired by his supporters is his determination to be steadfast and unwavering, when others might shift their ground.
Can this quality be taken too far? Here's the Times again:
Mr. Bush is right when he says he cannot be blamed for everything that happened on or before Sept. 11, 2001. But he is responsible for the administration's actions since then. That includes, inexcusably, selling the false Iraq-Qaeda claim to Americans. There are two unpleasant alternatives: either Mr. Bush knew he was not telling the truth, or he has a capacity for politically motivated self-deception that is terrifying in the post-9/11 world.
(Times editorial via Eschaton)
I've said before: "steadfastly and unwaveringly *wrong.*"
For our sake, I hope he's knowingly lying. For his, perhaps, that he's truly that deluded. ...But that's by far the scarier option.
Posted by: Gramina at June 17, 2004 09:55 AM