February 03, 2007

Da Manly Code

C.W. Nevius, writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, states that although women appear to be forgiving of SF Mayor Gavin Newsom's sexual liaison with a married woman, men, supposedly, regard Newsom's indiscretion as an "Unforgivable Breach of Man Code."

Make no mistake — having an affair with the wife of a trusted male colleague is an irrevocable Man Code violation.

"Hello?" wrote Mike Mulholland, 43, who grew up in the Bay Area before moving to San Diego County. "Newsom slept with his friend's wife. What if he stole from a friend? Or tried to frame a friend? Would that also be nobody's business?"

Yes that's right: according to correspondents Nevius picks out as reprentatives of the Man on the Street, having sex with a (male) friend's wife is equivalent to stealing his property. In other words, You poke it, you own it.

Here's what seems to have actually happened: In the course of the breakup with his wife, Newsom got sexually involved with a staffer, Ruby Rippey-Tourk, who is married to another sometime member of the Newsom inner circle, Alex Tourk. Sometime after the affair was over, Rippey-Tourk evidently entered a substance-abuse recovery program. As part of her recovery process, Rippey-Tourk came clean to her husband about the affair. Alex Tourk's response to his wife's attempt to make amends was to storm into Newsom's office to confront him and tender his resignation as Newsom's campaign manager on the spot.

In other words, Alex Tourk resigned in a patriarchal huff because Gavin Newsom poked what Tourk supposed he owned. Ruby Rippey-Tourk's agency is, strangely enough, not relevant to the story.

I know that I am far from the mainstream of American values, but nevertheless, it seems to me that the real bad guy here, the person who really is violating the norms of common decency by being a patriarchal asshole, is Alex Tourk.

Posted by abostick at February 3, 2007 01:12 PM
Comments

Your claim is that Alex Tourk, by resigning as Newsom's campaign manager, wronged Newsom and Tourk's wife more than they wronged him by cheating on him?

Posted by: hgfalling at February 3, 2007 03:19 PM

How could Newsom be said to be cheating on anyone? Assuming that the Tourk's relationship was monogamous, nevertheless the agreement of monogamy was an agreement between Tourk and Rippey-Tourk, to which Newsom was not a party.

Fundamentally, Rippey-Tourk's presumed breaking of her marriage vows is a private matter between her and Tourk. It's a breach within their relationship, and the remedy is, or ought to be, for the two of them to work together to heal the breach — or to end the relationship. Rippey-Tourk told her husband as part of her substance-abuse recovery process, the part the 12-Step people call "making amends." For Tourk to fly off the handle like that speaks rather poorly for the quality of his engagement with her recovery process.

One thing you probably ought to know about me and my take on the issue is my attitude towards monogamy: I Guess Your Kink Is OK, But...."

Posted by: Alan Bostick at February 3, 2007 05:11 PM

Part of having a friendship (which I assume was the case - most of the time "campaign manager" isn't so much of "just a job" as many other jobs are) is not willfully engaging in behavior that you know will hurt the other person. Based on Tourk's reaction, I can't imagine that Newsom just thought that he would be fine with it. So there's a breach in Tourk-Newsom's relationship too.

Just because *you* don't make monogamous agreements doesn't exempt you from caring about the monogamous agreements of your friends and the effects of your actions in light of those agreements.

Now if Newsom and Tourk weren't friends (which I've assumed throughout because of Tourk's job), then meh, it's just a mild thing. And Tourk could certainly deal with things better. But calling him "the real bad guy" seems a little over the top to me.

Posted by: hgfalling at February 5, 2007 06:53 AM

Part of having a friendship (which I assume was the case - most of the time "campaign manager" isn't so much of "just a job" as many other jobs are) is not willfully engaging in behavior that you know will hurt the other person. Based on Tourk's reaction, I can't imagine that Newsom just thought that he would be fine with it. So there's a breach in Tourk-Newsom's relationship too.

Just because *you* don't make monogamous agreements doesn't exempt you from caring about the monogamous agreements of your friends and the effects of your actions in light of those agreements.

Now if Newsom and Tourk weren't friends (which I've assumed throughout because of Tourk's job), then meh, it's just a mild thing. And Tourk could certainly deal with things better. But calling him "the real bad guy" seems a little over the top to me.

Posted by: hgfalling at February 5, 2007 06:54 AM

Blaming Tourk is sad. The real and only blame falls on Newsom and Rippey-Tourk pure and simple. Tourk going off emotionally while he tendered his resignation is not the issue. I can't fathom how anyone could justify that. Newsom was the one who cheated on a friend, violated the sanctity of another's marriage, and possibly violated city ethic laws. You can't cut it any other way unless you have some underlying philosophical or political motive you want to profess. Newsom and Tourk's wife have to live with what they have sowed; and Tourk has to as well since he is now unemployed. Newsom is a scumbag if he was a conservative or a liberal, mayor or plain old citizen. He's a scumbag like all others who cheat on their spouses or with someone elses' spouse, and I would divorce my wife (drunk or not) if she let another man pound her. What are you people thinking??

Posted by: Dan at February 5, 2007 11:14 PM

I'm not as anti-monogamy as you are; I just choose not to practice it. So by my lights, the monogamy kink is completely OK, and I would have to know what his agreements with Rippey-Tourk were to know who broke what. I'd have to say that sleeping with a married person who has a monogamous arrangement, if not cheating, is accessory-to-cheating. Personally, I certainly want to know what deals the people I'm considering as lovers have with other partners, spouses or not, and I have no interest in sleeping with a cheater.

Posted by: Debbie at February 6, 2007 01:26 PM
Search

Sign up to play at PokerStars now!
Recent Entries
I Always Cry at Superhero Movies
Thomas M. Disch 1940-2008
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Thirteen and Fourteen
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Eleven and Twelve
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Nine and Ten
Novelty Candy with a Kinky Bent
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Eight
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Seven
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Six
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Five
Recent Comments
Debbie to Da Manly Code
Dan to Da Manly Code
hgfalling to Da Manly Code
hgfalling to Da Manly Code
Alan Bostick to Da Manly Code
hgfalling to Da Manly Code
Archives
By Month
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
November 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003

By Category
Blogosphere
Creativity
Dreams
Fiction
Iraq
Life
Main
News & Events
Poetry
Poker
Politics
Spirituality
Theater
Torture
Videos

Master Archive List
Email
Alan Bostick

Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 2.63