February 03, 2008

Don't Watch the SuperBowl With Organizational Psychologists

A group of spectators sat watching a football game. They saw two groups of eleven men facing each other, heard a whistle blow, then suddenly action erupted, followed by another blast of the whistle, whereupon everyone stopped. One of the spectators said, “That was a good draw play, we gained eight yards.” When questioned about his jargon, he said, “Well, the quarterback handed the ball to the fullback, who counted off several seconds, waiting for the opposition to be drawn in, and then crashed into the middle of the line and advanced eight yards before being tackled and stopped. That's what is called a 'draw play.'” Someone asked a second spectator, “What did you see?” “Well,” he replied,”I saw the acting out in different degrees of the needs for aggression and achievement in the players and the effects of how each views himself in relation to the other twenty-one men.” A third spectator said, “I saw eleven men on either side engage in a pattern of coordinated behavior with very well worked out expectations of action for each position in regard to other positions, until these patterns were disrupted by the other side.” A fourth spectator said, “I also saw your role relationship and integrations. But additionally, I saw a leadership structure, which included a man in one position calling signals during the play and a captain exercising some limited authority. I saw a social system of eleven men opposing another social system, each of which was composed of many subsystems and structures like leadership, conflict, plus a coach attached to each system.” A fifth spectator said, “I saw two kinds of traditions: the ritualistic and emotional meaning of a game of this sort and the heightened excitement and tension of this particular game due to the traditional rivalry between these two teams. Both traditions reflect the competitive and peer values of our young adult culture.”

(From Benne, Kenneth D., Robert Chin, and Warren G. Bennis: Science and practice. From The Planning of Change: Readings in the Applied Behavioral Sciences, edited by Warren G. Bennis, Kenneth D. Benne, and Robert Chin, Holt Rinehard & Winston, 1961)

A football game is very like a snake. No, wait — a tree! A wall...?

Tags:

Posted by abostick at February 3, 2008 06:29 PM
Comments
Search

Sign up to play at PokerStars now!
Recent Entries
I Always Cry at Superhero Movies
Thomas M. Disch 1940-2008
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Thirteen and Fourteen
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Eleven and Twelve
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Days Nine and Ten
Novelty Candy with a Kinky Bent
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Eight
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Seven
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Six
2008 World Series of Poker Diary — Day Five
Recent Comments
Archives
By Month
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
November 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003

By Category
Blogosphere
Creativity
Dreams
Fiction
Iraq
Life
Main
News & Events
Poetry
Poker
Politics
Spirituality
Theater
Torture
Videos

Master Archive List
Email
Alan Bostick

Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 2.63